Description
This paper seeks to reconceptualise emancipation in critically theorising International Rela-tions (IR) by developing ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ versions of normativity and applying them as condi-tions for a pluriversal dialogue between different cosmologies. We start with the premise that ‘critical IR’ is both Eurocentric and a-normative, and argue that a normative engage-ment with critical discourses both inside and outside the West is necessary to recapture its emancipatory promise. Drawing on the work of Max Horkheimer, Herbert Marcuse and Jacques Derrida, we develop ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ versions of normativity. The former, we argue, operates as a critical corrective of thick normative positions, reclaiming their openness to difference, while not making substantive moral or political claims itself. We then apply these versions of normativity to examine the possibility of a global pluriversal dialogue be-tween different cosmologies. Cosmologies, we argue, refer to sets of ontological and epis-temological claims about the human condition that are inherently normative. ‘Thin’ norma-tivity applied to the ‘thick’ claims of cosmologies prevents the essentialisation and hierarchi-sation of cosmological difference(s) by revealing and de-constructing the latter’s potentially discriminatory, exclusionary, and violent tendencies. In so doing, it facilitates a global inter-cosmological dialogue which we regard as the objective of a post-western, critical IR.
