Description
How has trust research advanced in international politics in the decade? Almost 10 years ago, we published an article that showed how this research agenda could be divided up into rationalist, psychological, and sociological approaches. Since that time, a new generation of trust scholars have developed these research strands and added new perspectives, from power to practice to relationality. This paper shows how each of these new research directions fit or fail to fit into our original typology, suggesting that while the typology primarily holds, there is now greater within variance that gives greater freedom to researchers interested in trust to choose a perspective that best meets the diverse global problems that they wish to study.
