Description
In recent years, debates surrounding the reunification of Ireland have gained significant momentum, fueled by the Brexit referendum result and the electoral successes of Sinn Féin on both sides of the border. Much of the discourse has focused on the economic and political prerequisites for reunification, as well as the anticipated costs and whether these should be the primary consideration. However, the environmental and climate-related conditions that would be necessary for reunification have received little attention. This omission is particularly striking given that Ireland functions as a single biogeographic entity, divided only by a relatively recent and historically contentious political boundary. Additionally, many of Ireland's most sensitive and protected conservation areas span this border.
This paper explores the divergence in environmental governance across the Irish border, examining how and why this divergence has expanded since Brexit, and what implications this has for the future of nature and climate in a reunited Ireland. By focusing on the cross-border site of Sliabh Beagh, I highlight the contrasting approaches to conservation and environmental oversight. I argue that framing reunification in terms of protected sites and priority species—rather than solely through economic arguments—could provide a more compelling foundation for reunification campaigns.
