Description
The end of American unipolarity has ushered in a new era of transnational ideological competition, reshaping global order and amplifying disorder. This abstract explores how the decline of a singular hegemonic framework has intensified ideological rivalries, challenging the stability of international systems. As multipolarity emerges, competing ideologies—liberal democracy, authoritarian capitalism, populist nationalism, and religious fundamentalism—vie for influence across borders, fueling both cooperation and conflict.
Drawing on examples such as China’s promotion of state-led development models, Russia’s neo-Eurasianist narratives, and the resurgence of populist movements in Europe and the Americas, this paper analyzes how ideological competition drives global (dis)order. Unlike the unipolar era, where U.S.-led liberal norms dominated, multipolarity enables diverse actors—state and non-state—to project ideological visions through soft power, disinformation, and economic leverage. This fragmentation erodes universal norms, fostering hybrid governance models and localized conflicts while complicating global cooperation on issues like climate change and security.
The paper argues that transnational ideological competition exacerbates disorder by undermining shared values and institutional trust, yet it also creates opportunities for pluralistic dialogue if managed effectively. By examining the interplay of ideology and power in a post-unipolar world, this study highlights the need for adaptive diplomacy and inclusive frameworks to mitigate conflict and rebuild cooperative global structures. The findings underscore the urgency of addressing ideological divides to navigate the complexities of an increasingly contested and disordered international landscape.