Description
The most significant aspect of the future of international studies lies in the generation of acceptable definitions, rules and agreements. In this new age of ever-increasing wave of globalization, explicit understanding of global governance with acceptable definitions, rules and agreements have become a necessity. Therefore, the central puzzle that this study seeks to delve in is that how the lack of generation of essential attributes like accurate definitions, rules and agreements by the field of international studies makes multiple complex layers of engagement in global governance chaotic, anarchic, less effective and sometimes complete failure. This study has taken the case study of current chaotic global nuclear governance which is a multilayer involvement of different nations through different modes like treaties, agreements, initiatives etc. This multilateral unbinding chaotic arrangement has failed in prohibiting the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Therefore, this paper analyses the ideological underpinnings set and spread by the field of international studies and its success and failure.
