Description
UN missions that pursue ‘stabilization’ have led to a number of new trends ranging from the ‘robust’ use of force, closer cooperation with the host state, engagement with counter-terrorism and lastly a focus on rebuilding the rule of law. The mandates of MINUSMA and MINUSCA make specific mention of supporting the rule of law and the missions themselves have carried out numerous activities to end impunity and restablish the rule of law. This is important in the context of stabilization since the missions have a closer relationship with the host state and express strategies (and mandates) to ‘extend state authority’. Entrenching the rule of law is one core method of by which the UN seeks to extend state authority. By reopening prisons, rebuilding courts and providing a secure environment for magistrates to return, the UN facilitates the reestablishment of state authority. This paper first discusses the notion of stabilization and what it involves. Second, the UN’s understanding of the rule of law is briefly explored. Thirdly, the various avenues by which MINSUMA and MINUSCA have sought to rebuild the rule of law are discussed including the Special Criminal Court in the CAR. Lastly, the consequences of this shift toward a rule of law focus is assessed. The argument is made that while ending impunity can be important to ensure human rights violations do not persist, there needs to be an overarching, bottom-up strategy in place to allow communities to be part of the rule of law process.
